تحلیل روند تحقیقات در تجربه گردشگری: تحلیل کتاب‌سنجی
محورهای موضوعی : مطالعات اجتماعی و گردشگری، جامعه شناسی گردشگری
لیلا ایلچی
1
(دانشجوی دکتری، دانشکده مدیریت، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران)
مصباح سیوندیان
2
(کارشناسی ارشد، دانشکده مدیریت، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران )
امیرسالار ونکی
3
(دانشجوی دکتری، دانشکده مدیریت، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران)
کلید واژه: تحلیل کتاب¬سنجی, تجربه گردشگری, مرور ادبیات محاسباتی, شبکه هم رخدادی, شبکه همکاری,
چکیده مقاله :
هدف این تحقیق بررسی روند تحقیقات در حوزه تجربه گردشگران با استفاده از تحلیل کتاب سنجی می باشد. بدین منظور اطلاعات 2683 مقاله منتشرشده در بازه زمانی سال 1980 تا سال 2020 در پایگاه داده ای وب‌آو‌ساینس تحلیل می شوند. از نرم افزار ووس‌ویوور به منظور تحلیل و مصورسازی نتایج استفاده می شود. در این پژوهش به دو سطح تحلیل پرداخته می شود. در سطح اول به بررسی روند انتشار مقالات و همچنین بررسی تأثیر نویسندگان، مجلات و مقالات پرداخته می شود. در سطح دوم، ساختار شبکه هم رخدادی کلمات کلیدی و شبکه همکاری نویسندگان و مؤسسات تجزیه و تحلیل می گردد. نتایج تحقیق نشان می دهند که تحقیقات در زمینه تجربه گردشگری در سال های اخیر رشد چشم گیری داشته است و بیشترین مقالات در سال 2019 منتشر شده اند. پیش بینی می شود که با توجه به روند گذشته، روند تحقیقات در آینده رشد فزاینده ای داشته باشد. از میان حوزه های تحقیقاتی، حوزه های مهمان پذیری و اوقات‌فراغت، مدیریت و مطالعات زیست‌محیطی سه حوزه ای هستند که بیشترین مقالات در زمینه تجربه گردشگری را شامل می شوند. رسانه‌های اجتماعی، اعتماد، نظرات کاربران و رقابت‌پذیری از جمله روندهای در حال ظهور در ادبیات می‌باشند. گردشگری سلامت، گردشگری غذایی، تجربه اجتماعی، خلق ارزش مشترک، اصالت، تجربه فرهنگی، تجربه در مقصد، کوله به دوش‌ها، فناوری اطلاعات، تفاوت فرهنگی، میراث فرهنگی، تجربه دانش‌آموزان و دانشجویان، مدیریت پایدار و حمل‌و نقل موضوعاتی هستند که در ادبیات به آن‌ها پرداخته شده است. تحلیل شبکه همکاری نویسندگان نشان داد در حال حاضر 35 گروه تحقیقاتی در سراسر دنیا در این زمینه فعالیت می‌کنند و دانشگاه پلی‌تکنیک هنگ‌کنگ بیشترین اثرگذاری بر شبکه همکاری بین‌المللی را داشته است.
This study set out to investigate the trend of studies conducted on tourist experience using bibliometric analysis. To this end, the study analyzed 2683 articles published in the Web of Science database from 1980 to 2020 using the VOS Viewer software to visualize and analyze the results. In this regard, two analysis levels were considered. At the first level, the publication trend and the impact factor of authors, journals, and articles were examined. At the second level, the structure of the co-occurrence network of keywords and the co-authorship network of authors, institutions, and countries were analyzed. The findings of the study indicated a significantly growing trend of studies (most of which were published in 2019) conducted on tourism experience in recent years, which is expected to continue to grow in the future. On the other hand, hospitality and leisure, management, and environmental studies were found as the highly researched areas, with most articles being published on tourism experience. Moreover, social media, trust, user opinions, and competitiveness are among the emerging research areas in the relevant literature. In this regard, health tourism, culinary tourism, social experience, shared value creation, authenticity, cultural experience, destination experience, backpackers, information technology, cultural differences, cultural heritage, students’ experiences, sustainable management, and transportation are among the main topics addressed in the literature. On the other hand, the analysis of the authors' co-authorship network revealed that thirty-five research groups are currently working in this field worldwide, with the Hong Kong Polytechnic University exerting the highest influence on the international collaboration network.
Beerli, A., & Martin, J. D. (2004). Factors influencing destination image. Annals of Tourism Research, 31(3), 657–681.
Bouyssou, D., & Marchant, T. (2011). Ranking scientists and departments in a consistent manner. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(9), 1761–1769.
Casey, D. L., & McMillan, G. S. (2008). Identifying the “invisible colleges” of the industrial & labor relations review: a bibliometric approach. ILR Review, 62(1), 126–132.
Chen, C.-C., & Petrick, J. F. (2013). Health and wellness benefits of travel experiences: A literature review. Journal of Travel Research, 52(6), 709–719.
Cobo, M. J., Martínez, M.-Á., Gutiérrez-Salcedo, M., Fujita, H., & Herrera-Viedma, E. (2015). 25 years at Knowledge-based systems: A bibliometric analysis. Knowledge-Based Systems, 80, 3–13.
Cong, L., Newsome, D., Wu, B., & Morrison, A. M. (2017). Wildlife tourism in China: a review of the Chinese research literature. Current Issues in Tourism, 20(11), 1116–1139.
Crooks, V. A., Kingsbury, P., Snyder, J., & Johnston, R. (2010). What is known about the patient’s experience of medical tourism? A scoping review. BMC Health Services Research, 10(1), 266.
Ding, Y. (2011). Scientific collaboration and endorsement: Network analysis of coauthorship and citation networks. Journal of Informetrics, 5(1), 187–203.
Durko, A. M., & Petrick, J. F. (2016). Travel as relationship therapy: Examining the effect of vacation satisfaction applied to the investment model. Journal of Travel Research, 55(7), 904–918.
Eide, D., Fuglsang, L., & Sundbo, J. (2017). Management challenges with the maintenance of tourism experience concept innovations: Toward a new research agenda. Tourism Management, 63, 452–463.
Freeman, L. C. (1978). Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1(3), 215–239.
Gee, C. Y., & Fayos-Sola, E. (1997). International tourism: A global perspective. World Tourism Organization.
Getz, D., & Brown, G. (2006). Critical success factors for wine tourism regions: a demand analysis. Tourism Management, 27(1), 146–158.
Glänzel, W., & Schubert, A. (2004). Analyzing scientific networks through co-authorship. In Handbook of quantitative science and technology research (pp. 257–276). Springer.
Goyal, N. (2017). A “review” of policy sciences: bibliometric analysis of authors, references, and topics during 1970–2017. Policy Sciences, 50(4), 527–537.
Hammersley, M. (2001). On’systematic’reviews of research literature: a narrative response to Evans & Benefield. British Educational Research Journal, 27(5), 543–554.
Holland, W. H., Powell, R. B., Thomsen, J. M., & Monz, C. A. (2018). A systematic review of the psychological, social, and educational outcomes associated with participation in wildland recreational activities. Journal of Outdoor Recreation, Education, and Leadership, 10(3).
Kim, J.-H., Ritchie, J. R. B., & McCormick, B. (2012). Development of a scale to measure memorable tourism experiences. Journal of Travel Research, 51(1), 12–25.
Law, J., Bauin, S., Courtial, J., & Whittaker, J. (1988). Policy and the mapping of scientific change: A co-word analysis of research into environmental acidification. Scientometrics, 14(3–4), 251–264.
Law, R., Bai, B., Ritchie, J. R. B., Tung, V. W. S., & Ritchie, R. J. B. (2011). Tourism experience management research. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management.
Mannell, R. C., & Iso-Ahola, S. E. (1987). Psychological nature of leisure and tourism experience. Annals of Tourism Research, 14(3), 314–331.
Martínez, M. A., Herrera, M., Contreras, E., Ruiz, A., & Herrera-Viedma, E. (2015). Characterizing highly cited papers in social work through H-classics. Scientometrics, 102(2), 1713–1729.
Merigó, J. M., Gil-Lafuente, A. M., & Yager, R. R. (2015). An overview of fuzzy research with bibliometric indicators. Applied Soft Computing, 27, 420–433.
Mihailović, B. (2017). Marketing services for the hotel and restaurant. Економика-Часопис За Економску Теорију и Праксу и Друштвена Питања, (1), 19–30.
Moed, H., De Bruin, R., & Van Leeuwen, T. H. (1995). New bibliometric tools for the assessment of national research performance: Database description, overview of indicators, and first applications. Scientometrics, 33(3), 381–422.
Murphy, P., Pritchard, M. P., & Smith, B. (2000). The destination product and its impact on traveler perceptions. Tourism Management, 21(1), 43–52.
Noyons, E. C. M., Moed, H. F., & Luwel, M. (1999). Combining mapping and citation analysis for evaluative bibliometric purposes: A bibliometric study. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(2), 115–131.
Olawumi, T. O., & Chan, D. W. M. (2018). A scientometric review of global research on sustainability and sustainable development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 183, 231–250.
Packer, J., & Ballantyne, R. (2016). Conceptualizing the visitor experience: A review of literature and development of a multifaceted model. Visitor Studies, 19(2), 128–143.
Prayag, G., Hosany, S., Muskat, B., & Del Chiappa, G. (2017). Understanding the relationships between tourists’ emotional experiences, perceived overall image, satisfaction, and intention to recommend. Journal of Travel Research, 56(1), 41–54.
Quan, S., & Wang, N. (2004). Towards a structural model of the tourist experience: An illustration from food experiences in tourism. Tourism Management, 25(3), 297–305.
Radhakrishnan, S., Erbis, S., Isaacs, J. A., & Kamarthi, S. (2017). Novel keyword co-occurrence network-based methods to foster systematic reviews of scientific literature. PloS One, 12(3), e0172778.
Rahman, N. H. A., Khalifah, Z., & Ismail, H. N. (2017). Addressing the Importance of the Sensory Aspect in Tourism Studies—A Literature Review. Advanced Science Letters, 23(4), 3167–3169.
Ritchie, J. R. B., & Hudson, S. (2009). Understanding and meeting the challenges of consumer/tourist experience research. International Journal of Tourism Research, 11(2), 111–126.
Sedighi, M. (2016). Application of word co-occurrence analysis method in the mapping of the scientific fields (case study: the field of Informetrics). Library Review, 65(1/2), 52–64.
Shanshi, L. I., Scott, N., & Walters, G. (2014). Potential methods for measuring emotion in Chinese tourism advertising. G20 First East-West Dialogue on Tourism and the Chinese Dream, 66.
Sie, L., Patterson, I., & Pegg, S. (2016). Towards an understanding of older adult educational tourism through the development of a three-phase integrated framework. Current Issues in Tourism, 19(2), 100–136.
Sims, R. (2009). Food, place, and authenticity: local food and the sustainable tourism experience. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 17(3), 321–336.
Skavronskaya, L., Scott, N., Moyle, B., Le, D., Hadinejad, A., Zhang, R., … Shakeela, A. (2017). Cognitive psychology and tourism research: state of the art. Tourism Review.
Sotiriadis, M. D. (2017). Sharing tourism experiences in social media. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management.
Stone, M. J., & Petrick, J. F. (2015). Reflections on Learning from Domestic Travel.
Stone, P., & Sharpley, R. (2008). Consuming dark tourism: A thanatological perspective. Annals of Tourism Research, 35(2), 574–595.
Su, H.-N., & Lee, P.-C. (2010). Mapping knowledge structure by keyword co-occurrence: a first look at journal papers in Technology Foresight. Scientometrics, 85(1), 65–79.
Sundbo, J., & Hagedorn-Rasmussen, P. (2008). The back staging of experience production in Sundbo. J. and Darmer, P.(Eds), Creating Experiences in the Experience Economy, Elgar, Cheltenham.
Taraghi, Z., Lolaty, H. A., Mohammadpour, R. A., & Abbasabadi, A. O. (2017). Strategies to promote hope and spirituality in the elderly: A narrative review. Annals of Tropical Medicine and Public Health, 10(6), 1619.
The World Bank. (2020). Services, value added (% of GDP). Retrieved from https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NV.SRV.TOTL.ZS
Tung, V. W. S., & Law, R. (2017). The potential for tourism and hospitality experience research in human-robot interactions. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management.
Tung, V. W. S., & Ritchie, J. R. B. (2011). Exploring the essence of memorable tourism experiences. Annals of Tourism Research, 38(4), 1367–1386.
Tussyadiah, I. P. (2015a). An exploratory study on drivers and deterrents of collaborative consumption in travel. In Information and communication technologies in tourism 2015 (pp. 817–830). Springer.
Tussyadiah, I. P. (2015b). Personal technology and tourism experience. ISCONTOUR.
Uriely, N. (2005). The tourist experience: Conceptual developments. Annals of Tourism Research, 32(1), 199–216.
van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
Van Eck, N., & Waltman, L. (2014). Visualizing bibliometric data. Measuring Scholarly Impact: Methods and Practice: Springer.
Vindrola-Padros, C., Brage, E., & Chambers, P. (2018). On the road and away from home: a systematic review of the travel experiences of cancer patients and their families. Supportive Care in Cancer, 26(9), 2973–2982.
Wang, N. (1999). Rethinking authenticity in tourism experience. Annals of Tourism Research, 26(2), 349–370.
Wearing, S., & McGehee, N. G. (2013). Volunteer tourism: A review. Tourism Management, 38, 120–130.
WTTC. (2019). Economic Impact Reports. Retrieved from https://wttc.org/Research/Economic-Impact
Wu, L., & Li, X. (2017). Sharing tourism experiences: literature review and research agenda. Visitor Experience Design, 220–233.
Wuni, I. Y., Shen, G. Q. P., & Osei-Kyei, R. (2019). Scientometric review of global research trends on green buildings in construction journals from 1992 to 2018. Energy and Buildings.
Xiang, Z., Du, Q., Ma, Y., & Fan, W. (2017). A comparative analysis of major online review platforms: Implications for social media analytics in hospitality and tourism. Tourism Management, 58, 51–65.
Yang, E. C. L., Khoo-Lattimore, C., & Arcodia, C. (2017). A systematic literature review of risk and gender research in tourism. Tourism Management, 58, 89–100.
Zhang, J., Xie, J., Hou, W., Tu, X., Xu, J., Song, F., … Lu, Z. (2012). Mapping the knowledge structure of research on patient adherence: knowledge domain visualization based co-word analysis and social network analysis. PloS One, 7(4), e34497.